Connect with us

Pakistan

Will SC finally accept parliament’s competence?

Published

on



ISLAMABAD:

All eyes are on the Supreme Court which is likely to conclude today [Tuesday] its proceedings on petitions seeking annulment of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023, a law that seeks to regulate the chief justice of Pakistan’s (CJP) discretionary powers.

Some lawyers wonder whether the majority of judges on the 15-member full court will acknowledge parliament’s competence to make laws regulating the administrative workings of the apex court.

Advertisement

“Parliament’s competence to make laws related to the Supreme Court working is a tricky question,” said a senior lawyer, speculating that the majority of judges would accept parliament’s competence.

“But it is not clear as to whether the majority of judges will endorse the law to the extent of giving the right of appeal against judgments given under Article 184 (3) of Constitution,” he added.

The majority of judges have already disclosed their mind by giving observations about the “legislative competence” of parliament. Visibly, the judges’ opinion is divided in this case. However, according to a senior lawyer, it will be difficult to predict what will be the final verdict.

Perhaps for the first time, judges who are raising questions about the lack of transparency in the internal workings of the judiciary are in the driver’s seat.

Read ‘Parliament’s intent good’, CJP says of law curtailing powers

Advertisement

These judges are also not scared of the fact that if the law is endorsed by the apex court then parliament will make more laws for regulation of the SC’s internal working.

That is why Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah noted that there is a fear that if the law is endorsed, a floodgate will open. If any law strengthens the judiciary then it will be endorsed but if any law violates the principle of independence of judiciary then it will be struck down, he said.

During the hearing on Monday, it was revealed that CJP Qazi Faez Isa has given up his predecessors’ policy to pass instruction to the SC registrar about the listing of cases before each bench. CJP Isa said he just passed general instructions to the SC registrar about listing of urgent matters.

It has been witnessed that no judge is defending the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 184 (3) by the CJPs since restoration of judiciary in March 2009.

It has been learnt that the record of the Supreme Court Human Rights cell is not available.

Advertisement

Justice Munib Akhtar, however, “expressed serious reservation over the things which are imputed to the retired chief justices” during the hearing.

He also questioned who would be the master of roster, if this law is declared legal. Parliament will be the master of roster then. This will directly conflict with the independence of the judiciary, he said.

Justice Shah said now the concept of “master” has come to end and collective wisdom will be relied on.

Read more: CJP Isa seeks input on judges’ appointment criteria

Some senior lawyers wonder as to why parliament could not make any law to regulate the discretionary powers of the CJP in all these years.
There are several reasons for this. During former CJP Iftikhar Chaudhry’s term, the PPP led government had become very unpopular and was facing a tough time both at the hand of the opposition led by the PML-N and as well as the security establishment.

Advertisement

The PPP led government could not show the courage to regulate the CJP’s discretionary powers. At that time, the perception regarding the superior judiciary was also good in the public eyes.

When former CJP Mian Saqib Nisar misused his discretionary powers during the PML-N’s rule, the establishment and the PTI were backing him.

However, when former CJP Umar Ata Bandial lost support from the establishment after he started judicial proceedings to hold general elections for the Punjab Assembly, parliament took advantage of the situation and made the law to regulate the discretionary powers of the CJP.

Moreover, Justice Bandial also could not unite the Supreme Court and some judges openly criticized his selection of judges in benches hearing political cases.

Read more: SC forms six benches for next week

Advertisement

Some lawyers are questioning whether the Supreme Court judges will express similar concerns regarding the manipulation of judicial proceedings in high-profile cases by powerful circles.” They wonder also why full court meetings were not summoned earlier to amend the rules to structure the discretionary powers of the chief justice.

Former CJP Asif Saeed Khosa wanted to regulate public interest jurisdiction but the majority of judges did not support him. Subsequently, he formed a committee to give suggestions about the regulation of public interest litigation. After his retirement, his successors did not opt to summon the full court meeting to regulate the CJP’s discretionary powers.

CJP Isa has scored an initial victory by convening a full court to hear this case, even though his predecessors established benches to achieve the desired outcome.” Proceedings of the case are being live telecast on TV.



Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pakistan

SHC’s stay on executive committee orders irks PBC

Published

on

By



ISLAMABAD:

 

Pakistan Bar Council Vice Chairman Haroonur Rasheed has taken strong exception over the Sindh High Court to grant stay on its executive committee orders, demanding of the chief justice of Pakistan to look into the matter and take appropriate action in this regard.

Advertisement

In a statement issued on Monday, the PBC vice chairman said, “It is often observed that Orders of Executive Committee of the Pakistan Bar Council which are assailed by the aggrieved person(s) before the Hon’ble High Court of Sindh through civil suit are being taken up by the High Court of Sindh in the Court or in Chamber and injunctive Order has been passed which are not entertainable in the eye of law due to lack of jurisdiction.”

Rasheed said, “The High Court of Sindh has no jurisdiction to set aside any Order assailed which is passed by the Pakistan Bar Council or its Executive Committee at Islamabad the proper forum for that is Courts of ICT, so any order passed by the High Court of Sindh that would be non-existing and nullity in the eye of law as one rather sitting in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab or Balochistan cannot set over the territorial jurisdiction and the High Court of Sindh should not pass injunctive Orders on the matters decided by the Pakistan Bar Council at Islamabad just to please their blue eyed person(s), which amount to undue interference in smooth functioning of a statutory body having its office in Islamabad.”

The statement added, “The tendency of such like issues creates serious doubts upon credibility of those decisions which have been passed without jurisdiction.”

Rasheed said that no high court of any province had jurisdiction, especially the SHC, to create hindrance in affairs of the regulatory body of lawyers who had the mandate under Section 13(2) of the Legal Practitioners & Bar Councils Act, 1973, to decide matters of Provincial/Islamabad Bar Councils and all bar associations of the country, which were challenged before it.



Advertisement

Continue Reading

Pakistan

Pakistan, UAE ink MoUs for mega investments

Published

on

By



ISLAMABAD:

Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) inked several Memoranda of Understandings (MoUs), paving the way for multi-billion dollar investments in diverse initiatives outlined by the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC).

The signing ceremony took place in Abu Dhabi, witnessed by Caretaker Prime Minister Anwaarul Haq Kakar and UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, subsequent to a bilateral meeting between the two leaders.

Advertisement

The MoUs cover investment cooperation across various sectors, including energy, port operations, waste water treatment, food security, logistics, mining, aviation, and banking and financial services. The agreements aim to foster collaboration and stimulate significant investments in these key areas, a handout released by the Media Wing of the Prime Minister’s Office and the Information Ministry.

On the occasion, Kakar termed the signing of the MoUs a historic event that “will take economic cooperation between both brotherly countries to new heights and open doors of economic prosperity and socio-economic development of Pakistan”.

Kakar also highlighted the success of the SIFC in creating a business and investment-friendly environment through one-window operation and fast-tracking the initiatives. He expressed the hope that the MoUs would turn into tangible projects very soon.

Advertisement

Separately, Kakar, who is on a two-day visit to the UAE, said in a video message that with the signing of the MoUs, the bilateral economic and strategic relations had entered into a new era of bilateral cooperation. On that he congratulated the people of Pakistan and the UAE.

“Foundation of friendship with Pakistan that was laid by Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan in the 1970s, has been taken forward by his son Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan to a new era,” the prime minister said in his message.

Earlier, Prime Minister Kakar held a bilateral meeting with Sheikh Mohamed. Chief of Army Staff General Syed Asim Munir was also present during the meeting. In their talks, the two leaders reaffirmed their resolve to strengthen the bilateral strategic cooperation and dialogue.

Prime Minister Kakar expressed profound gratitude for the UAE’s firm support for Pakistan in economic and financial domain. The UAE is home to 1.8 million Pakistanis, contributing to the progress, prosperity and economic development of the two brotherly countries, he noted.

Read more: Kakar arrives in Abu Dhabi on two-day visit

Advertisement

During the meeting, regional and global developments in the region were also discussed with particular reference to the escalating hostilities in the occupied Palestine. The prime minister expressed concern over the human cost of the dire situation in Gaza.

Kakar reiterated Pakistan’s full support to the UAE’s Presidency of the COP-28 and underlined the importance of the global gathering on climate change as an opportunity for meaningful progress towards effective and result oriented global actions on key areas, including the Loss and Damage fund.

Later in the day, Prime Minister Kakar embarked upon a two-day bilateral visit to Kuwait. During the November 28-29, 2023 visit, the prime minster will meet Kuwaiti Crown Prince Sheikh Meshal Al Jaber Al Sabah, Prime Minister Sheikh Ahmed Nawaf Al Ahmed AL Sabah.

The Foreign Office spokesperson said in a press release that the visit would include the signing of various MoUs in the fields of manpower, information technology, mineral exploration and food security, energy and defence.
 



Advertisement

Continue Reading

Pakistan

IMF secured autonomy to access SBP info: Fawad

Published

on

By



ISLAMABAD:

Privatisation Minister Fawad Hasan Fawad said on Monday that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) secured autonomy for Pakistan’s central bank to get direct access to the information that the federal government was reluctant to share with the global lender.

The startling statement by Fawad may further deepen suspicions about the motives behind securing the absolute autonomy for the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) in January last year by the global money lender. This also raises questions on the role of the then central bank governor, Dr Reza Baqir.

Advertisement

The IMF first got the autonomy for the SBP, then made the central bank governor dependent on it and was now directly getting the information, which we earlier did not want to give to the IMF, Fawad said while responding to a question about the banking sector.

The privatisation minister maintained that a question should also be raised as to why the IMF and the World Bank do not ask about reducing the spreads in lending and deposit rates of the commercial banks, which were one of the highest in the world. He said the Privatisation Commission was getting only 4% profit on its Rs6 billion deposits placed with the National Bank of Pakistan.

Before 2022, the IMF used to deal with the central bank through the Ministry of Finance. But post amendments in the SBP Act the finance ministry does not know about SBP-IMF dealings, except in cases where the SBP governor himself reveals information to the finance minister or to the ministry.

In 2022, opposition parties had strong concerns over the SBP Act amendments, saying it compromised Pakistan’s economic sovereignty and gave absolute authority to the SBP to take key economic decisions independently.

The absolute autonomy was granted in January 2022 in return for a $1 billion loan tranche. The governor has also been given complete autonomy in his affairs.

Advertisement

In 2021, The Express Tribune had reported that the then central bank management was pushing the finance ministry to accept the amendments in toto or the IMF tranche of $1 billion would be compromised.

The Express Tribune on Monday sent a question to Baqir, who spearheaded SBP autonomy, about Fawad’s statement. But his response could not be received till the filing of the story. Baqir left the country after his three-year tenure ended in 2022.

Fawad also spoke about the need of privatisation and the reforms in Pakistan.

The minister said that under the Privatisation Law it takes about 462 days to complete one privatisation transaction, adding that the interim government would try to privatise the entities that are difficult for a political government due to its consequences.

The interim government is trying to privatise PIA but has not yet succeeded.

Advertisement

Fawad said the government is expected to sign a Financial Advisory Service Agreement (FASA) with the Ernest and Young-led consortium. The cabinet approved the E&Y consortium hiring this month but the agreement signing remains pending and would be finalised this week.

Read IMF sees $8b dip in debt in two years

After the signing of the agreement, the advisor would need at least six to nine weeks to prepare a privatisation transaction structure and another 20 to 26 weeks to complete restructuring of the PIA balance sheet.

Fawad revealed that for the past six weeks he was facing difficulties to put together a credible PIA board, as people were reluctant to serve on it for a short term period. He said there were also difficulties in arranging loans for the PIA.

The government had tasked a technical committee to prepare a PIA debt restructuring plan and also arrange Rs15 billion loans for the national carrier within two weeks. There has been no success on this front for the past over one month.

Advertisement

The privatisation minister revealed that people on the state-owned enterprises boards were appointed by the last coalition government based on their political affiliations.

The Privatisation Board was also appointed by the PDM government during its last days and it is widely seen as a political entity having little expertise in the complex matters, according to sources.
Fawad opposed handing over power distribution companies to the provinces, fearing it may result in the worst form of cartelisation in the power sector.

The minister also spoke “very bitterly” about the poor performance of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) and set four conditions for any reforms in Pakistan, prominently stating that there should not be any further increase in the size of the government.

“Anything which increases the size of the government is not a reform,” Fawad said in a statement that apparently kills Caretaker Finance Minister Dr Shamshad Akhtar’s proposal to establish a new Tax Policy Division for separating policy from the FBR.

Prime Minister Anwaarul Haq Kakar had not approved Dr Akthar’s restructuring plan and referred the matter to another committee, including Fawad in the FBR restructuring process.

Advertisement

Fawad highlighted the flaws in the country’s taxation system, saying that around 93% of the collected tax revenue is either voluntary or withholding; whereas, only 7% is actually collected by the FBR.

He said in three years revenue board had sent recovery notices to individuals worth Rs600 billion but the actual recovery was less than Rs4 billion from 2013 to 2016. Since 2016, the tax burden on corporate taxpayers has increased by more than 40% on average.

Such a burden has not only contributed to encouraging people to stay out of the tax system but also de-corporatisation.

The public sector reforms should include bureaucratic reforms and taxation system reforms, he said, adding that these two areas are crucial for improving the performance of the state.

Fawad observed that the current state of the public sector was unsustainable.

Advertisement

In three years from 2018-2021, the government spent Rs2.54 trillion in terms of subsidies, grants, and loans to keep commercial SOEs operational. The size of the government has increased by more than three times in the last couple of decades.



Continue Reading

Trending